Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Seneca County, New York


Identification_Information:
Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date: 20100218
Title: Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Seneca County, New York
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Fort Worth, Texas
Publisher: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Other_Citation_Details: ny099
Online_Linkage: http://soildatamart.nrcs.usda.gov/Survey.aspx?County=NY099
Description:
Abstract:
This data set is a digital soil survey and generally is the most
detailed level of soil geographic data developed by the National
Cooperative Soil Survey. The information was prepared by digitizing
maps, by compiling information onto a planimetric correct base
and digitizing, or by revising digitized maps using remotely
sensed and other information.

This data set consists of georeferenced digital map data and
computerized attribute data. The map data are in a soil survey area
extent format and include a detailed, field verified inventory
of soils and miscellaneous areas that normally occur in a repeatable
pattern on the landscape and that can be cartographically shown at
the scale mapped. A special soil features layer (point and line
features) is optional. This layer displays the location of features
too small to delineate at the mapping scale, but they are large
enough and contrasting enough to significantly influence use and
management. The soil map units are linked to attributes in the
National Soil Information System relational database, which gives
the proportionate extent of the component soils and their properties.

Purpose: SSURGO depicts information about the kinds and distribution of soils on the landscape. The soil map and data used in the SSURGO product were prepared by soil scientists as part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey.
Supplemental_Information: Digital versions of hydrography, cultural features, and other associated layers that are not part of the SSURGO data set may be available from the primary organization listed in the Point of Contact.
Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date: 19980524
Ending_Date: 20100218
Currentness_Reference: publication date
Status:
Progress: Complete
Maintenance_and_Update_Frequency: As needed
Spatial_Domain:
Bounding_Coordinates:
West_Bounding_Coordinate: -76.981
East_Bounding_Coordinate: -76.586
North_Bounding_Coordinate: 43.024
South_Bounding_Coordinate: 42.541
Keywords:
Theme:
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: None
Theme_Keyword: soil survey
Theme_Keyword: soils
Theme_Keyword: Soil Survey Geographic
Theme_Keyword: SSURGO
Place:
Place_Keyword_Thesaurus: USGS Geographic Names Information System (GNIS)
Place_Keyword: New York
Place_Keyword: Seneca County
Place_Keyword: Cayuga Quadrangle
Place_Keyword: Dresden Quadrangle
Place_Keyword: Dundee Quadrangle
Place_Keyword: Geneva North Quadrangle
Place_Keyword: Geneva South Quadrangle
Place_Keyword: Lodi Quadrangle
Place_Keyword: Ludlowville Quadrangle
Place_Keyword: Lyons Quadrangle
Place_Keyword: Montezuma Quadrangle
Place_Keyword: Ovid Quadrangle
Place_Keyword: Romulus Quadrangle
Place_Keyword: Savannah Quadrangle
Place_Keyword: Seneca Falls Quadrangle
Place_Keyword: Sheldrake Quadrangle
Place_Keyword: Trumansburg Quadrangle
Place_Keyword: Union Springs Quadrangle
Access_Constraints: None
Use_Constraints:
The U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation
Service, should be acknowledged as the data source in products
derived from these data.

This data set is not designed for use as a primary regulatory tool
in permitting or citing decisions, but may be used as a reference
source. This is public information and may be interpreted by
organizations, agencies, units of government, or others based on
needs; however, they are responsible for the appropriate
application. Federal, State, or local regulatory bodies are not to
reassign to the Natural Resources Conservation Service any
authority for the decisions that they make. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service will not perform any evaluations of these maps
for purposes related solely to State or local regulatory programs.

Photographic or digital enlargement of these maps to scales greater
than at which they were originally mapped can cause misinterpretation
of the data. If enlarged, maps do not show the small areas of
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a larger scale. The
depicted soil boundaries, interpretations, and analysis derived from
them do not eliminate the need for onsite sampling, testing, and
detailed study of specific sites for intensive uses. Thus, these data
and their interpretations are intended for planning purposes only.
Digital data files are periodically updated. Files are dated, and
users are responsible for obtaining the latest version of the data.

Point_of_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Contact_Position: State Soil Scientist
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing address
Address: USDA - Natural Resources Conservation Service
Address: New York State Office
Address: The Galleries of Syracuse, 5th Floor, Suite 354
Address: 441 South Salina Street
City: Syracuse
State_or_Province: NY
Postal_Code: 13202
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 315-477-6521
Contact_TDD/TTY_Telephone: 800-877-8339
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: steven.indrick@ny.usda.gov

Data_Quality_Information:
Attribute_Accuracy:
Attribute_Accuracy_Report: The attribute accuracy is tested by manual comparison of the source with hard copy plots and/or symbolized display of the map data on an interactive computer graphic system. Selected attributes that cannot be visually verified on plots or on screen are interactively queried and verified on screen. In addition, the attributes are tested against a master set of valid attributes. All attribute data conform to the attribute codes in the signed classification and correlation document and amendment(s).
Logical_Consistency_Report:
Certain node/geometry and topology GT- polygon/chain relationships
are collected or generated to satisfy topological requirements
(the GT-polygon corresponds to the soil delineation). Some of these
requirements include: chains must begin and end at nodes, chains
must connect to each other at nodes, chains do not extend through
nodes, left and right GT-polygons are defined for each chain
element and are consistent throughout, and the chains representing
the limits of the file are free of gaps. The tests of logical
consistency are performed using vendor software. All internal
polygons are tested for closure with vendor software and are checked
on hard copy plots. All data are checked for common soil lines (i.e.,
adjacent polygons with the same label). Edge locations generally do
not deviate from centerline to centerline by more than 0.01 inch.

The Soil Survey of (NY099)  Seneca County, New York is edge matched to
all of the adjacent SSURGO certified soil surveys:
NY011  Cayuga County, New York
NY069  Ontario County, New York
NY097  Schuyler County, New York
NY109  Tompkins County, New York
NY117  Wayne County, New York
NY123  Yates County, New York

Seneca Lake separates Seneca County from Yates County.
Cayuga Lake separates Seneca County from Cayuga County.

Most feature edges (polygon and line segments) match adjacent ones in the
edge matched survey areas, however, most feature labels don't match the
adjacent feature labels in edge matched surveys.

Descriptive attributes (tabular information about the polygons and line
segments) were developed specifically for each survey area.  Although most
don't match exactly, the descriptive attributes of most polygon and line
segments in this survey are nearly the same as adjacent ones in edge matched
soil surveys.

The soil survey area boundaries match.

Completeness_Report:
gement are the same
or very similar for common uses. Generally they are grouped together
because some common feature, such as steepness, stoniness, or
flooding, determines their use and management. If two or more
additional map units would serve no useful purpose, they may be
included in the same unit. Each delineation has at least one of the
major components, and some may have all of them. The same principles
regarding the proportion of minor components that apply to
consociations also apply to undifferentiated groups. The same
principles regarding proportion of inclusion apply to
undifferentiated groups as to consociations.

Minimum documentation consists of three complete soil profile
descriptions that are collected for each soil added to the legend,
one additional per 3,000 acres mapped; three 10 observation
transects for each map unit, one additional 10 point transect per
3,000 acres.

A defined standard or level of confidence in the interpretive
purity of the map unit delineations is attained by adjusting the
kind and intensity of field investigations. Field investigations
and data collection are carried out in sufficient detail to name
map units and to identify accurately and consistently areas of
about 5 acres.

Positional_Accuracy:
Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy:
Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy_Report:
The accuracy of these digital data is based upon their
compilation to base maps that meet National Map
Accuracy Standards at a scale of 1 inch equals 1,000
feet. The difference in positional accuracy between the
soil boundaries and special soil features locations in the
field and their digitized map locations is unknown. The
locational accuracy of soil delineations on the ground varies
with the transition between map units.

For example, on long gently sloping landscapes the transition
occurs gradually over many feet. Where landscapes change
abruptly from steep to level, the transition will be very
narrow. Soil delineation boundaries and special soil features
generally were digitized within 0.01 inch of their locations on
the digitizing source. The digital map elements are edge matched
between data sets. The data along each quadrangle edge are
matched against the data for the adjacent quadrangle. Edge
locations generally do not deviate from centerline to centerline
by more than 0.01 inch.

Lineage:
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service
Publication_Date: 1972
Title: Soil Survey of Seneca County, New York
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: atlas
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Washington, D.C.
Publisher: U.S. Government Printing Office
Source_Scale_Denominator: 15840
Type_of_Source_Media: paper
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 1966
Source_Currentness_Reference: final correlation date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: SCS1
Source_Contribution: information for soil map unit delineations special feature locations, and data on soil properties
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: U.S. Geological Survey
Publication_Date: 1942-1971
Title: multiple 7.5 minute topographic quadrangle map positives
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: map
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Reston, Virginia
Publisher: U.S. Geological Survey
Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
Type_of_Source_Media: stable base material
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 1994
Source_Currentness_Reference: publication date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: USGS1
Source_Contribution: compilation source
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Soil Information Systems Laboratory, Cornell University
Publication_Date: unpublished material
Title: multiple ratioed film positives of published maps
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: map
Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
Type_of_Source_Media: stable base material
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 1963
Source_Currentness_Reference: date aerial photography flown
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: SISL1
Source_Contribution: compilation source
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Soil Information Systems Laboratory
Publication_Date: unpublished material
Title: multiple soil maps, including soil features, compiled on 7.5 minute topographic quadrangles
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: map
Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
Type_of_Source_Media: stable base material
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 1966
Source_Currentness_Reference: final correlation date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: SISL2
Source_Contribution: planimetrically correct base map
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Soil Information Systems Laboratory, Cornell University
Publication_Date: unpublished material
Title: annotated overlay
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: map
Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
Type_of_Source_Media: stable base material
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 1966
Source_Currentness_Reference: final correlation date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: SISL3
Source_Contribution: scanning source
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date: 19980524
Title: Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Seneca County, New York
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: vector digital data
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Fort Worth, Texas
Publisher: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
Type_of_Source_Media: online
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 19980524
Source_Currentness_Reference: publication date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS1
Source_Contribution: re-archiving source
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date: 2004
Title: National Soil Information System (NASIS) data base
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: tabular digital data
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Fort Collins, Colorado
Publisher: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Type_of_Source_Media: database
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date: 2004
Ending_Date: 2004
Source_Currentness_Reference: publication date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Source_Contribution: attribute (tabular) information
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date: 2005
Title: Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Seneca County, New York
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: vector digital data
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Fort Worth, Texas
Publisher: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Type_of_Source_Media: online
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 2005
Source_Currentness_Reference: publication date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS2
Source_Contribution: re-archiving source
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date: 2005
Title: Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Seneca County, New York
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: vector digital data
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Fort Worth, Texas
Publisher: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center
Type_of_Source_Media: online
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 2005
Source_Currentness_Reference: publication date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS3
Source_Contribution: re-archiving source
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date: 2006
Title: Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Seneca County, New York
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: vector digital data
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Fort Worth, Texas
Publisher: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center
Type_of_Source_Media: online
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 2006
Source_Currentness_Reference: publication date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS4
Source_Contribution: re-archiving source
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: U.S Department of Agriculture, Farm Service Agency
Publication_Date: 2008
Title: NAIP imagery for Seneca County, New York
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: remote sensing image
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Salt Lake City, Utah
Publisher: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farm Service Agency APFO
Type_of_Source_Media: online
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 2008
Source_Currentness_Reference: date aerial photography was flown
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: FSA1
Source_Contribution: editing selected water and soil polygon boundaries to current imagery
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date: unpublished material
Title: ARCGIS geodatabase for Seneca County, New York
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: vector digital data
Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
Type_of_Source_Media: CD-ROM
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 2009
Source_Currentness_Reference: date of soil survey update
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS5
Source_Contribution: source for digital revision
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date: 2005-2008
Title: Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) databases for adjacent surveys
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: vector digital data
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Fort Collins, Colorado
Publisher: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Information Technology Center
Other_Citation_Details: These SSURGO certified soil surveys are adjacent to the Soil Survey of (NY099) Seneca County, New York: NY011 Cayuga County, New York NY069 Ontario County, New York NY097 Schuyler County, New York NY109 Tompkins County, New York NY117 Wayne County, New York NY123 Yates County, New York
Source_Scale_Denominator: 12000, 24000
Type_of_Source_Media: online
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date: 2005
Ending_Date: 2008
Source_Currentness_Reference: dates of publication
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS6
Source_Contribution: used to check joins to the adjacent soil surveys
Process_Step:
Process_Description: The Soil Survey of Seneca County, New York was published in 1972. A detailed evaluation revealed that while many soil classifications have changed because of changes to soil taxonomy, the soil polygons are accurately placed on the landscape.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: SCS1
Process_Date: 1974
Process_Step:
Process_Description: The 1:24,000 7.5 minute topographic quadrangle scribe coats representing the various feature separates were photographically reproduced as differentially screened composites on 7 mil matte finished mylar overlays by USGS, Rolla, MO., (USGS1) from second generation negatives. USGS indicates quadrangles published in the 1940's and 1950's are less reliable from a geodetic standpoint than quadrangles published later. The publication information of the relevant quadrangles follows: Cayuga quadrangle, 1954 Dundee quadrangle, 1942, photoinspected, 1976 Geneva North quadrangle 1953, photorevised, 1978 Geneva South quadrangle, 1953, photorevised, 1978 Lodi quadrangle, 1942, photorevised, 1978 Ludlowville quadrangle, 1971 Lyons quadrangle, 1953, photorevised, 1978 Montezuma quadrangle, 1954, photorevised, 1978 Ovid quadrangle, 1970 Cayuga quadrangle, 1954 Romulus quadrangle, 1953 Savannah quadrangle, 1953 photorevised, 1978 Seneca Falls quadrangle, 1953, photorevised, 1978 Sheldrake quadrangle, 1971 Trumansburg quadrangle, 1970 Union Springs quadrangle, 1955
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: USGS1
Process_Date: 1994
Process_Step:
Process_Description: Published maps from the Soil Survey of Seneca County,New York were ratioed to 1:24000 scale using an office copying machine by SISL.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: SCS1
Process_Date: 1995
Process_Step:
Process_Description: The soil polygon data on the 1:24000 ratioed film positives were manually compiled to the 1:24000 7.5 minute topgraphic quadrangle film positives that were produced by USGS as described above. The intent of the compilation process was to place the soil boundaries on the appropriate landforms as inferred by the topographic data. Sometimes the landforms as inferred or denoted by the planimetrically correct topographic data differed slightly from the same landform as inferred or denoted by the distorted photographic data. As a natural consequence of these differences, the compiled polygons often differed slightly in shape from the same polygon in the published soil survey. Another slight discrepancy resulting from compilation were some small water bodies that were added to the digital data if they were displayed on the USGS photorevised quadrangles. Also, polygons without symbols and polygons with common boundaries, that were published in the soil survey were corrected during the digitizing process. Also symbols were added to the mapping unit legend and consequently to the tabular data base. For example, quarries were mapped as polygons in the published report, but instead of a map unit legend symbol, the polygons were identified by either spelling out the word "quarry" or by using the special feature symbol. QP was added to the attribute legend and the tabular database for quarries. Likewise, BP was added for borrow pits, DP was added for dumps, and SP was added for shale pits. Since in a digital soils data base, water is considered a map entity, W, for water was added to the data bases. XXX was added to the data bases to represent those polygons that were unattributed in the published soil survey and could not be remedied through expert assistance in the digitizing facility.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: SISL1, USGS2
Process_Date: 1994
Process_Step:
Process_Description: The soil polygons from the 1:24,000 7.5 minute topographic quadrangle film positives were transferred to a stable base material punch registered to the 1:24,000 7.5 minute topographic quadrangles.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: SISL2
Process_Date: 1995
Process_Step:
Process_Description: The soil polygon overlay were scanned by Midwest Graphics Services, Milwaukee, WI at 200 dpi. using a Houston Instruments LDS 4000 scanner. The raster data were imported into LTPlus Version 2.361A at SISL for processing, raster editing, map neat line development, labeling, edge matching and vector conversion. The data were imported into LT4X Version 4.02 for additional neatline development and vector editing. Penultimately, the data were imported into NRCS GRASS Version 4.13. The data were written to a Digital Line Graph optional format with the v. export command. The data are in the NAD 1927. Special soil features were digitized by NCGC. Compilation, digitizing and quality control were performed at the Soil Information Systems Laboratory Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, which is an entity of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, staffed by USDA-NRCS and Cornell University Soil Scientists and Digitizing technicians. The digital maps of soil lines were also reviewed by the Natural Resources Conservation Service National Cartography and Geospatial Center staff for adherence to SSURGO standards in May, 1996.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: SISL3
Process_Date: 1996
Process_Step:
Process_Description: The Map Unit Interpretations Record data base was developed by Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Scientists according to national standards.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: SCS1
Process_Date: 1994
Process_Step:
Process_Description: The online SSURGO data were imported into ARC/INFO Version 8.3 at the Natural Resources Conservation Service, Wisconsin Digitizing Unit. The SSURGO data were processed with May 2004 Re-archiving AMLs provided by the National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas (NCGC) for compliance with the new format required for distribution purposes. The SSURGO data were submitted to the Soil Data Warehouse for archival and distribution.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS1
Process_Date: 2004
Process_Step:
Process_Description: The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined that the tabular data should be released for official use. A selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20041216
Process_Step:
Process_Description: The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20041220
Process_Step:
Process_Description: The SSURGO database of Seneca County, New York was downloaded from U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center (NCGC) distribution site for the purpose of updating the survey area boundary to be consistent with the Ontario County, New York SSURGO dataset. The data were then run through the 20040524 ReCert AMLs provided by NCGC and submitted to the Soil Data Warehouse for archival and distribution.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS2
Process_Date: 2005
Process_Step:
Process_Description: The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20050506
Process_Step:
Process_Description: The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined that the tabular data should be released for official use. A selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20051212
Process_Step:
Process_Description: The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20051214
Process_Step:
Process_Description: The online SSURGO data set was downloaded by the Wisconsin Digitizing Unit in Madison, Wisconsin. The Seneca Survey area boundary was adjusted to be an exact match to the survey area boundaries of the SSURGO certified surveys of Cayuga County, Schuyler County, and Tompkins County, New York. The data was processed through the 20040524 certification AMLs provided by the National Cartographic and Geospatial Center in Ft. Worth, TX. The data was then uploaded to the datamart.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS3
Process_Date: 20060915
Process_Step:
Process_Description: The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20060915
Process_Step:
Process_Description: The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined that the tabular data should be released for official use. A selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20061211
Process_Step:
Process_Description: Soil scientists entered/edited data in NASIS for geomorphic description and selected chemical and physical properties. The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20061211
Process_Step:
Process_Description: The soils staff in New York downloaded the SSURGO data for Seneca County from the Soil Data Warehouse. Water polygons and adjacent soil polygons in the existing SSURGO spatial data were reviewed against the 1972 hardcopy soil survey atlas sheets and the 2008 NAIP imagery. The digital mapping was revised where water polygons were determined to be ponded soil, so that the spatial data corresponds more closely with the original hard copy atlas sheets. Some edits to other polygons were made based on the imagery and atlas sheets. The revised geodatabase was sent to the Michigan Digitizing Unit (MIDU) in East Lansing, Michigan for review and certification.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: SCS1, FSA1, NRCS4, NRCS5
Process_Date: 2009
Process_Step:
Process_Description: The MIDU staff checked the spatial data with the ARCGIS Version 9.2 software. The boundaries of this soil survey were adjusted to match the adjacent soil surveys. To remove excess vertices, the soil boundaries were generalized at a 0.5 meter tolerance. After the soil survey was edited, the area, line and point feature classes were converted to ARC/INFO coverages and exported as e00 files. The digital maps of the mapping units and the special soil features were imported into the ARC/INFO Version 7.2.1 software for review and certification. The MIDU staff checked the data with a set of ARC Macro Language (AML) programs developed by the NCGC. The seamless coverages were checked using the January 2006 SSURGO Evaluation AML programs. Upon successful completion of the SSURGO Evaluation, the county coverages, feature file and the metadata were electronically transferred to the NRCS Staging Server to be joined with the tabular data.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS5, NRCS6
Process_Date: 20100216
Process_Step:
Process_Description: The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined that the tabular data should be released for official use. A selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is stored in the database table named sainterp.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20100204
Process_Step:
Process_Description: Soil scientists reviewed and edited data for hydric rating and hydric criteria. Interpretations for storm water management were added to the set of interpretations. The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20100218
Process_Step:
Process_Description: The tabular data were extracted from the data mart without change. The spatial data's coordinate system was transformed to UTM Zone 18, Northern Hemisphere (NAD 83) using ESRI ArcObjects 8.3 "ConvertFeatureClass" and exported to an ESRI shapefile.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NASIS
Process_Date: 20100222

Spatial_Data_Organization_Information:
Direct_Spatial_Reference_Method: Vector

Spatial_Reference_Information:
Horizontal_Coordinate_System_Definition:
Planar:
Grid_Coordinate_System:
Grid_Coordinate_System_Name: Universal Transverse Mercator
Universal_Transverse_Mercator:
UTM_Zone_Number: 18
Transverse_Mercator:
Scale_Factor_at_Central_Meridian: 0.999600
Longitude_of_Central_Meridian: -75.000000
Latitude_of_Projection_Origin: 0.000000
False_Easting: 500000.000000
False_Northing: 0.000000
Planar_Coordinate_Information:
Planar_Coordinate_Encoding_Method: coordinate pair
Planar_Distance_Units: meters
Coordinate_Representation:
Abscissa_Resolution: 0.000000
Ordinate_Resolution: 0.000000
Geodetic_Model:
Horizontal_Datum_Name: North American Datum of 1983
Ellipsoid_Name: Geodetic Reference System 80
Semi-major_Axis: 6378137.000000
Denominator_of_Flattening_Ratio: 298.257222

Entity_and_Attribute_Information:
Detailed_Description:
Entity_Type:
Entity_Type_Label: Special Soil Features
Entity_Type_Definition: Special Soil Features represent soil, miscellaneous area, or landform features that are too small to be digitized as soil delineations (area features).
Entity_Type_Definition_Source: Agricultural Handbook 18, Soil Survey Manual, 1993, USDA, SCS.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Special Soil Features Codes
Attribute_Definition: Special Soil Features labels represent specific Special Soil Features. These features are identified with a descriptive label. The label is assigned to the point or line assigned to represent the feature on maps.
Attribute_Definition_Source: Agricultural Handbook 18, Soil Survey Manual, 1993, USDA, SCS; National Soil Survey Handbook, Title 430-VI, part 647 (current issue), USDA, NRCS.
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Codeset_Domain:
Codeset_Name: Classification and Correlation of the Soils of Seneca County, New York
Codeset_Source: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Overview_Description:
Entity_and_Attribute_Overview:
Map Unit Delineations are closed polygons that may be dominated
by a single soil or miscellaneous area component plus allowable
similar or dissimilar soils, or they can be geographic mixtures
of groups of soils or soils and miscellaneous areas.

The map unit symbol uniquely identifies each closed map unit
delineation. Each symbol corresponds to a map unit name. The
map unit key is used to link to information in the National
Soil Information System tables.

Map Unit Delineations are described by the National Soil
Information System database. This attribute database gives the
proportionate extent of the component soils and the properties for
each soil. The database contains both estimated and measured data
on the physical and chemical soil properties and soil
interpretations for engineering, water management, recreation,
agronomic, woodland, range, and wildlife uses of the soil.

The National Soil Information System database contains static
metadata. It documents the data structure and includes such
information as what tables, columns, indexes, and relationships
are defined as well as a variety of attributes of each of these
database objects. Attributes include table and column
descriptions and detailed domain information.

The National Soil Information System database also contains a
distribution metadata. It records the criteria used for selecting
map units and components for inclusion in the set of distributed
data.

Special features are described in the feature table.  It includes an
area symbol, feature label, feature name, and feature description for
each special and ad hoc feature in the survey area.

Entity_and_Attribute_Detail_Citation:
Soil Taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making and
interpreting soil surveys. Agricultural Handbook 436, 1999, USDA, SCS.

Keys to Soil Taxonomy (current issue), USDA, SCS.

National Soil Survey Handbook, Title 430-VI, part 647 (current
issue), USDA, NRCS.

Agricultural Handbook 18, Soil Survey Manual, 1993, USDA, SCS.


Distribution_Information:
Distributor:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical address
Address: 501 West Felix Street, Building 23, P.O. Box 6567
City: Fort Worth
State_or_Province: Texas
Postal_Code: 76115
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 800 672 5559
Contact_TDD/TTY_Telephone: 202 720 2600
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 817 509 3469
Resource_Description: Seneca County, New York SSURGO
Distribution_Liability:
Although these data have been processed successfully on a computer
system at the U.S. Department of Agriculture, no warranty expressed
or implied is made by the Agency regarding the utility of the data
on any other system, nor shall the act of distribution constitute
any such warranty. The U.S. Department of Agriculture will warrant
the delivery of this product in computer readable format, and will
offer appropriate adjustment of credit when the product is determined
unreadable by correctly adjusted computer input peripherals, or
when the physical medium is delivered in damaged condition. Request
for adjustment of credit must be made within 90 days from the date
of this shipment from the ordering site.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture, nor any of its agencies are
liable for misuse of the data, for damage, for transmission of
viruses, or for computer contamination through the distribution of
these data sets. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits
discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race,
color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political
beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all
prohibited bases apply to all programs.)

Standard_Order_Process:
Digital_Form:
Digital_Transfer_Information:
Format_Name: ArcView shapefile
Format_Information_Content: spatial
File_Decompression_Technique: WinZip or equivalent
Transfer_Size: 15.4
Digital_Transfer_Option:
Online_Option:
Computer_Contact_Information:
Network_Address:
Network_Resource_Name: http://SoilDataMart.nrcs.usda.gov/
Access_Instructions: Select desired survey area at above Internet Web site. An email address is required for receipt of instructions on retrieval via anonymous FTP. Anticipate a delay between submission of request at Web site and receipt of email message.
Digital_Form:
Digital_Transfer_Information:
Format_Name: ARC/INFO coverage
Format_Information_Content: spatial
File_Decompression_Technique: WinZip or equivalent
Transfer_Size: 15.4
Digital_Transfer_Option:
Online_Option:
Computer_Contact_Information:
Network_Address:
Network_Resource_Name: http://SoilDataMart.nrcs.usda.gov/
Access_Instructions: Select desired survey area at above Internet Web site. An email address is required for receipt of instructions on retrieval via anonymous FTP. Anticipate a delay between submission of request at Web site and receipt of email message.
Digital_Form:
Digital_Transfer_Information:
Format_Name: ARC/INFO interchange file
Format_Information_Content: spatial
File_Decompression_Technique: WinZip or equivalent
Transfer_Size: 15.4
Digital_Transfer_Option:
Online_Option:
Computer_Contact_Information:
Network_Address:
Network_Resource_Name: http://SoilDataMart.nrcs.usda.gov/
Access_Instructions: Select desired survey area at above Internet Web site. An email address is required for receipt of instructions on retrieval via anonymous FTP. Anticipate a delay between submission of request at Web site and receipt of email message.
Digital_Form:
Digital_Transfer_Information:
Format_Name: ASCII
Format_Information_Content: keys and attributes
File_Decompression_Technique: WinZip or equivalent
Transfer_Size: 12.1
Digital_Transfer_Option:
Online_Option:
Computer_Contact_Information:
Network_Address:
Network_Resource_Name: http://SoilDataMart.nrcs.usda.gov/
Access_Instructions: Select desired survey area at above Internet Web site. An email address is required for receipt of instructions on retrieval via anonymous FTP. Anticipate a delay between submission of request at Web site and receipt of email message.
Fees: There is currently no direct charge for requesting data or for retrieval via FTP.
Ordering_Instructions: Visit the above mentioned Internet Web Site, select state or territory, then select individual soil survey area of interest. Spatial line data and locations of special feature symbols are in ESRI ArcGIS (ArcView,ArcInfo) shapefile, coverage and interchange (i.e., export) formats. The National Soil Information System attribute soil data are available in variable length, pipe delimited, ASCII file format.
Turnaround: Typically within four hours

Metadata_Reference_Information:
Metadata_Date: 20100222
Metadata_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Contact_Position: State Soil Scientist
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing address
Address: USDA - Natural Resources Conservation Service
Address: New York State Office
Address: The Galleries of Syracuse, 5th Floor, Suite 354
Address: 441 South Salina Street
City: Syracuse
State_or_Province: NY
Postal_Code: 13202
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 315-477-6521
Contact_TDD/TTY_Telephone: 800-877-8339
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: steven.indrick@ny.usda.gov
Metadata_Standard_Name: Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata
Metadata_Standard_Version: FGDC-STD-001-1998